
sunset_directions (photo by saavem)
I was an early adapter to the Internet. I was dialling up to Bulletin Boards and sending off for underground magazines on floppy disc before the internet as we know it was around. And in the infancy of ‘the Web’, when it meant little more than something spiders created, I was telling everyone at school how amazing the Internet was. You could chat to people around the world, find information on your favourite band, get detailed information to help with homework, look up the most amazing jokes, and a million other things!
None of my friends really cared at the time. But in a flash, the Internet was THE big thing. Fast forward to today and now it’s simply the norm. We take it for granted, despite its relative newness.
As we have speedily adapted to this new way of life, has the internet replaced more traditional sources in terms of ease and accuracy? The 5th June edition of Times Higher Education discussed ‘the Google generation’, wondering if we have become too dependent (and Google-eyed) on the online search beast. Has the ease of finding information led to less critical thought and innovation, at a time when you’d rather expect the free flow of data to open up new possibilities?
I recently found a fantastic article from the site Publishing 2.0:
What newspapers still don’t understand about the web
After reading, I thought it’s no wonder most of us use Google as the first (and often only) port of call for information.
And in terms of academic research, going as far as Google Scholar (still Google!) and Wikipedia isn’t exactly breaking out into a secret world of exclusive information.
Google clearly does have a huge scope. You’d be mad not to use it. I do so frequently on a daily basis.
The problem is when we rely almost solely on just one resource.

