EduLinks

EduLinks – Week ending 13 May 2011

Starting today, EduLinks is going to be a regular, weekly affair.

Part weekly round-up of HE news, part useful linkage, EduLinks will now be based on my Twitter output over the last 7 days.

Since I already strive to get great links out over Twitter in the hope they’ll be useful to you, it makes sense to bring EduLinks in line with that. Hope the format works for you.

Fees concern and clearance sales

Universities Minister, David Willetts, has been making headlines this week. Times Higher Education first announced that Willetts was considering a quota-free recruitment of self-funding UK students. But once The Guardian reported on the possibility on Monday, there was a public outcry.

Willetts spoke on Radio 4, which only seemed to excite the story further. It gathered pace so quickly, that I wrote about the situation in my post ‘Upfront fees, perks for the rich, and the social mobility problem‘. The Daily Mash covered the story in a slightly different way, announcing, “It’s basically £36,000 for a hat”.

By the afternoon, the government had to put out a new response from Willetts, urging:

“There is no question of wealthy students being able to buy a place at university. Access to a university must be based on ability to learn not ability to pay.”

Sadly, all this panic took the focus away from the government’s new site for future students, Your Future. The site attempts to explain the new student fees system from September 2012. While some people have complained that there should be a clearer repayment calculator and greater stress on prices being nearer £9,000 than £6,000 for most students, the site is still a welcome addition.

Later in the week, The Independent interviewed Willetts. He mentioned the possibility of lower fees for places in clearing, which The Indy quickly dubbed ‘The great university clearance sale‘.

Gaining degrees and finding employment

University Alliance launched a new publication to highlight stories of empowered students. ‘More than just a degree‘ sets out to “refute notions of lazy students, unresponsive universities and unsatisfied employers”.

At the same time, McDonalds boss, Jill McDonald, suggested that not all school leavers should automatically opt to go to university. McDonald said, “The road many young people take today may not be the one we took in the past”. See Guardian and Standard reports for more.

The BBC, meanwhile, addresses the growing concern of ‘underemployment‘:

“Four years ago, there were 32% of university leavers in low-skilled jobs six months after graduating.

The study forecasts that this will rise to 42%, for graduates leaving this summer.”

Adding to the jobs concern, the state-funded Graduate Internship Scheme was closed.

Limiting student liability

For many reasons, not all students stay on at uni. Upon leaving, some students may have only been attending for a matter of days. However, they could have been liable to pay their full tuition fee for the year, before any student loan was liable to be paid.

Working with NUS, the government has agreed (subject to parliamentary approval) to restrict student liability for fees. While this may not impact upon large numbers of students, it is an important and welcome development.

Access agreements and uncertainties

If universities want to charge more than £6,000 in yearly tuition fees, they have to outline how they intend to help attract disadvantaged students and improve social mobility.

The Office For Fair Access (OFFA) has today published guidance to universities on how to produce an ‘access agreement’. Access agreements set out the ways in which an institution would promote and improve student retention, student outreach, financial assistance, and other activities to benefit social mobility.

It seems that, even without any changes to the proposed fees system in coming years, it’s going to take a couple of runs through the process before we get a true picture of what’s happening.

photo by john curley
photo by john curley

Speaking on the Radio 4 Today programme, OFFA’s director, Martin Harris, said that universities must prove what they promise to do ‘in retrospect’. While proposals must be ‘stretching and demanding’, this leaves universities with a largely free reign on how they want to proceed. For now.

Given the general flexibility so far allowed in creating access agreements, it’s no surprise that representative groups are positive. Paul Marshall, Executive Director of the 1994 Group said:

“By allowing universities to set their own widening participation benchmarks OFFA have recognised that each university has its own priorities, and will be best placed to set the most appropriate measures.”

Russell Group’s Wendy Piatt was equally upbeat:

“We welcome the fact that OFFA will be allowing universities some scope to set their own targets and milestones for access work, noting that ‘there is no single perfect measure of access performance’.”

Such open possibilities make it difficult to see how anyone will achieve an overall awareness of what will end up becoming necessary in the longer term. I strongly suspect that there will be alterations based on the first year or two, which will result in an even longer period before a manageable picture is revealed.

Will it ever be clear which aspects of the system really can help HE and student intake? Students and staff alike know they must jump through particular hoops to get from one place to another. The difference now is that the hoops have slightly changed and may change again.

Potential students can see they might suffer in terms of fees and repayments, but can they be certain at the same time that they’ll benefit from a more level playing field? Is there enough potential in the future to break down barriers and help young people in a more targeted fashion, even before the idea of university becomes an important life choice?

Unfortunately, we just don’t know. Social mobility has a long way to go. All universities play an important part in enhancing mobility. Therefore, it’s important to make sure there’s a limit to unnecessary exclusions that could have still played a helpful part. If these elements are removed prematurely due to lack of funds, improvements elsewhere will, at best, cause stasis, not growth.

At times like this, I often acknowledge the bumpy ride that’s ahead for anyone involved. But when is the road not bumpy? If it’s going to take several years before greater clarity can be achieved, it will probably be just in time for a new set of sweeping changes to come about.

Not everyone is having to tread water and there is plenty of opportunity for HE to shine further, but it would be foolish for me to say that any wide-ranging situation can ever experience a bump-free terrain.

Mission groups are mainly positive that access agreements won’t be a barrier to setting fees of their choosing. Future students are now aware that fees are likely to be a lot higher and they must choose based on new rules. Current developments expose the latest hurdle that needs crossing (or fighting). But the next hurdle will never be far away.

My analogy shouldn’t consist of a bumpy journey. It’s more like a bucking bronco ride. We stay on for as long as we can.

And if we fall off? Either jump back on or choose a different ride. Make of that what you will. I’m not sure I’ve worked it out yet…

Education: an attitude to life

A came across this little gem the other day:

“The tutor has succeeded when the students question what they are told. Critical analysis and questioning are central to a university education, so the end ‘product’ is not a collection of packages of knowledge but a way or treating such offerings. For this reason an education is not a collection of commodities, it is more like an attitude to life.” – [The Trouble With Higher Education, Hussey & Smith, 2009, p.50]

It’s not what you know, it’s how you use it.

EduLinks – Travel, Truth & Testing Times

More EduLinks goodness. Yay!

Set your own deadlines and find out the number of days between two dates with Date Calculator.

Stuck on repeat? PsyBlog explains why it’s persuasive to say the same thing over and over and over again.

PsyBlog also have 18 great reads on the psychology of persuasion.

William Ury on reaching agreement even in difficult circumstances. The walk from “no” to “yes”:

Jennifer Jones explains how she summarises notes from a piece of literature. Her questions will aid critical thinking when it comes to what you’re reading. My favourite question set is “Do you agree or disagree with the author? Why?” because it forces you to deal with your own thoughts on the subject.

The Boar reports on UK students leaving in droves to America, while the BBC asks if it pays to be a student in the US.

Speaking of going abroad, do you want to be paid to live in another country while you study? Erasmus lets you do that and Megan has the lowdown in her Insider’s Guide.

Chris Brogan says that you own your life, you own the distractions, and you set the limits.

We’re already half way through January. Have you made New Year resolutions and have they fallen by the wayside already? Many will have already given up. So why do we make New Year resolutions?

Your brain on improv:

You may want to keep reminding yourself of the 10 simple truths smart people forget.

Finally, Scott Young has produced a brief guide to learning faster and better. ‘Brief’ as in over 4,000 words. Make sure to bookmark it.

WikipediaWictionaryChambers (UK)Google imagesGoogle defineThe Free DictionaryJoin exampleWordNetGoogleUrban DictionaryAnswers.comrhymezone.comMerriam-Webster