Why Lectures Aren’t Dead & How to Deal With Difficult Lectures

Not all lecturers are the same:

“To excel as a lecturer, it is necessary to find delight as a lecturer. In part, this means ferreting out what is most intriguing about the topic under discussion. It also means attending carefully to learners and seeking and sharing their enthusiasm. A great lecture is not a rote mechanical reading of notes, but a kind of dance, in which lecturer and listeners watch, respond to, and draw energy and inspiration from each other. One of the greatest pleasures of lecturing occurs when learners pose insightful questions that the lecturer did not — perhaps even could not — foresee.” – Richard Gunderman, Is the Lecture Dead?

What makes a lecture work for you? Is it like a dance? What special quality makes your favourite lecturer top of your list?

I saw one person lecture a few times and it was clear how excited they were about the subject. Unfortunately, the excitement was inward and the speaking was almost monotone. The content didn’t matter, the lecturer simply wasn’t giving the audience a way in. The most interested of lecturers aren’t always the most interesting.

Photo by dalbera

Photo by dalbera

A lecturer must find what enthuses the audience and provide an angle they can follow. With a compelling story told well, you have a good start.

Lectures aren’t dead. They’re not dying. But we are growing used to them. They are everywhere, in so many guises. Lectures are offline, online, long, short, bite-sized, basic, advanced, MOOC-based, general, specific… Lectures are talks to an audience. That covers a lot of ground.

New methods of learning and discovering won’t kill off what’s gone before. I’m tired of such a binary, either/or debate. Communication matters, no matter what the angle. Get it right and the communication moves on. The learning continues.

Get stuck and people switch off. There’s no magic answer here.

The lecture is not at fault itself, especially since the term ‘lecture’ is vague. It might be the wrong setting in some cases and there may be better ways to express some concepts. But none of this suggests the end of lectures altogether. That wouldn’t make sense. The point is to have a range of learning resources.

Think of a textbook. When you find the core reading tough to grasp, you can look elsewhere. A similar textbook that’s not on your reading list may have similar information, but be several times easier for you to understand.

I’ve faced that loads of times. A poor book (for me) was replaced by a better book. Imagine if, instead, I got annoyed at books and vowed never to read one again. That would be meaningless.

Once I got a grip of major concepts through a book that spoke to me, I’d return to the core text with more confidence. Sometimes, on the luckiest occasions, I was able to ignore the main text completely.

What has all this got to do with lectures? Well, a good lecture is a good lecture. It’s the bad ones you need to deal with.

When a lecture hasn’t worked out for you, try these things:

  • Go over the slides and see if you can recover from those alone;
  • Look for similar lectures online. Open Culture is a good starting place with Free Online Courses and Free Online Certificate MOOCs listed;
  • Use your core textbooks to read up on terms you didn’t grasp at first;
  • When you’re REALLY stuck by one or two concepts, look them up on Simple Wikipedia;
  • Speak with your classmates, the lecturer, and online forums. Basically, get a conversation going. It’ll help you see things from other people’s perspectives and it should help your confidence when talking about difficult content.

How do you deal with difficult lectures?

Of course, it’s much better when the lecture and lecturer gel with you. My favourite lecturer at uni did the dance described in the quotation at the top of this post. The energy was there, the content was clear, and much of the audience felt involved. I learned a lot about good presentation at the same time.

Not bad for a simple lecture.

Recognise Your Actions With Ricky Gervais, a Six Year Old, and Yourself

“You should bring something into the world that wasn’t in the world before. It doesn’t matter what that is. It doesn’t matter if it’s a table or a film or gardening – everyone should create. You should do something, then sit back and say, “I did that.'” – Ricky Gervais

Ricky Gervais is on to something here. His comment makes me think of helping children to shine. A childlike imagination helps bring all sorts of things into the world that weren’t there before.

There’s no need to say ‘well done’ and ‘very good’ and ‘you’re so clever’ at everything a child does. Recognising what they did is enough.

“I see you have built that all by yourself.”
“So, you’ve drawn a picture of a bear.”
“Thank you for putting all the books back on the shelf.”

It’s that simple.

You should recognise your own actions too. Take the time to focus deeply on what you’ve done. It adds more meaning to what’s there. If you can’t appreciate your own creations, why create them in the first place? Enjoy them, learn from them, explore them more deeply. All you need to better engage with your actions is to step back and recognise them.

You can take that appreciation to whole new levels. Like when Bianca Giaever took what a six year old said and turned it into a short film. No heaping on the praise. Simply offering a visual representation of a little girl’s thoughts. Creating. Recognising. Appreciating. It’s all there.

There are some gems from the six year old advice too:

“You should just say ‘OK. I’m fine.’ I usually let it go. I just think of something that I really like to do and just think of something else until the nervous has gone out of me.”

And:

“Scared is scared of all the things you like.”

It’s all worth remembering.

Kids are awesome. They don’t need telling that all the time. Just recognise what they do and appreciate what happens along the way.

And that should go for everyone, by the way. Not just kids.

Image

Desperately Seeking a Narrative

Hello 2013, what stories do you have in store for us? And by ‘stories’, I mean that quite broadly. We live in stories all the time.

Toward the end of 2012, students from several universities took time out to pour drinks over themselves.

As you do.

Newcastle started it with milking. The process? Buy the milk, open the milk, pour the milk over your head.

That’s all well and good. However, Durham students argued, what would happen if you poured port over your head instead? Same situation, different drink.

The results weren’t much different, as it turns out, although the clothing stains were more difficult to get out in the wash.

First milking, then porting. Would it end with single malting, I wondered.

A bunch of freshers at St. Andrews quickly answered. And, no, it wasn’t fine whisky at all. It was Moet.

The results of a champagning experiment turned out to be very different to those from milking and porting. Why? Mainly because of the narratives chosen.

Stories are fantastic. Stories are useful for making a point. That’s why stories are used again and again. Narrative flow helps us all to understand what’s going on with minimum necessary effort.

Unfortunately, that narrative flow also helps to create stories that aren’t necessarily there in the first place.

Champagning at St. Andrews took on a much bigger story than Newcastle and Durham’s pouring attempts. From harmless joke to social commentary, from joining in to proving a point, from healthy rivalry to bitter competition, the story behind the video quickly grew much bigger than the video itself.

In fact, the video was taken down from YouTube and an apology was issued, yet the debate rumbled on. The milking and porting videos remain online.

Champagne apparently brings ideas of expense, snobbery, and special occasion. The concern, it seems, was that in associating St. Andrews with champagne and wastefulness would bring ideas of privilege, money, and further snobbery.

In this, baggage and associations enhanced the story further. This take on the narrative would give a negative spin on the university.

Both the Students’ Association and the university expressed unhappiness over the video. President, Freddie Fforde, said, “This video has undermined our image and undoes a lot of good we have done”. A representative from St. Andrews told student newspaper, The Stand, “In a time of austerity, this was at best insensitive, and at worst, lacking respect for the great many students, staff and townspeople in St Andrews who have for a long time been committed to tackling out of date stereotypes and raising more funds for bursaries and scholarships.”

Newcastle and Durham both had news coverage surrounding the pouring stunts. Yet St. Andrews gained more coverage after the subsequent response. And more opinion. It provided a new angle. And the more angles available, the easier it is to keep a story running.

The story is in the mind. It’s like asking whether or not you find the video funny. The choice is yours. The same goes for assessing the deeper meaning of its content.

We’ll never know exactly what motivated the champagning video and how it became what it did. Even the makers will look back differently to how things were in the beginning. It’s unavoidable; the true narrative is lost, because we aren’t documenting the story as it happens. That comes later and cannot be exact, even when we want it to be. And everyone involved will have had their own ideas.

What if St. Andrews students made exactly the same video with water instead of bubbly? Or whisky, as I’d suggested? Or a cocktail? Or an energy drink? Or something that wasn’t even a drink?

What if the champagne pouring video had been made by students from Oxford? Or Nottingham? Or Bath or Birkbeck or Birmingham? Or if the video hadn’t even been made by students at all?

What if the video was professionally produced for a TV audience instead? Or if the St. Andrews video had some sort of disclaimer attached to it? Or if students from different universities participated in the same prank together?

What if the St. Andrews students in the video had been from the most deprived backgrounds? Or they were people pretending to be St. Andrews students but were actually from another university?

There are no answers to any of these questions. The narratives would have changed, but there’s no way of telling how.

Taking down the champagning video and apologising for causing offense has added to the story. Subsequent responses also gave new breath.

My response to Milking was: ‘Meh,’ but I did mention it on Twitter.

My response to Porting was: ‘Oh dear. Let’s brace ourselves for loads of variations on this before it goes away.’ And I mentioned it again.

My response to Champagning was: ‘Right, the latest instalment. I can’t be bothered to point this out.’

This is my narrative to you, anyway. Those responses are not concrete and definitive facsimiles of my thoughts with no margin for error.

No matter what my responses were, here I am talking about everything in much greater detail now. And I wonder what stories will shape 2013.

I guess we won’t get to see any whisky-based antics, but do let me know if it happens. Not so much for the video, but so I can prepare for the narratives that arise from it.

A Linking Return: 30 Great EduLinks

I spent practically no time at all online over October. I missed you.

It’s good to be back. It’s a bit later than I’d planned, thanks to a poorly timed illness. On Twitter, I said hello and promptly disappeared again. How dare my immune system mess with my schedule!?

With a month of online content to check out, I’ve found loads of great stuff. So what better way to return than to give you a massive list of edulinks?

In no particular order, here are 30 great links on living, learning, and lots more:

  1. It’s time for you to stop worrying about what others think about you.
    http://www.thechangeblog.com/kissing-approval-goodbye/
  2. Why it’s important to ask more ‘why’ questions.
    http://www.psypost.org/2012/11/abstract-thinking-can-make-you-more-politically-moderate-14734
  3. Don’t let speed-reading stop you making notes.
    http://blogs.warwick.ac.uk/researchexchange/entry/speed_reading-note_taking/
  4. 10 things most people get wrong about memory.
    http://www.spring.org.uk/2012/10/how-memory-works-10-things-most-people-get-wrong.php
  5. Jeff Bezos says that people who are right a lot of the time often change their minds.
    https://37signals.com/svn/posts/3289-some-advice-from-jeff-bezos
  6. League tables, league tables everywhere! So what about a university league table on chair comfort? Or the number of chip shops in walking distance of campus?
    http://nuctutor.blogspot.com/2012/10/some-alternative-league-tables.html
  7. Local library AND uni library in one? That’ll be Worcester. Will we see more of this?
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/higher-education-network/blog/2012/oct/25/hive-library-worcester-university-council
  8. Ultra-Learning. How you can study a course module in a week and a half.
    http://calnewport.com/blog/2012/10/26/mastering-linear-algebra-in-10-days-astounding-experiments-in-ultra-learning/
  9. The problem with doing a viva.
    http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=421598&c=1
  10. Jane Austen and how the brain pays attention.
    http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/literally-psyched/2012/10/22/what-jane-austen-can-teach-us-about-how-the-brain-pays-attention/
  11. You don’t need to be available 24/7. You’ll be more productive that way.
    http://lifehacker.com/5953914/how-being-unreachable-makes-me-more-productive
  12. “We don’t know what the next big thing will be after Twitter, but if there is a pattern to this kind of thing it won’t look like or be like Twitter.”
    http://elearningstuff.net/2012/10/21/fickle/
  13. You may have learned the right answers. But the right answers can change…
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjSuaeVfE9I
  14. Hurrah for subject-based student societies!
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/mortarboard/2012/oct/15/subject-based-societies-standing-up-for-the-nerds
  15. How to Engage in Social Networks for Your Job Hunt.
    http://theundercoverrecruiter.com/engage-social-job/
  16. Are you fed up with reading so many lies and myths and fake stories? Here’s how to be one step ahead.
    http://lifehacker.com/5950871/how-to-spot-truth-in-the-sea-of-lies-rumors-and-myths-on-the-internet
  17. Learn to read a scientific report.
    http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/10/mf-learn-to-read-a-scientific-report/
  18. Unicorns, Beijing hip-hop culture, and rave entrepreneurialism… How far out is your dissertation?
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/mortarboard/2012/oct/10/students-is-your-dissertation-weird
  19. For PhD students, here’s what to consider when choosing a thesis topic.
    http://3monththesis.com/how-to-choose-a-thesis-topic/
  20. Does Music Help You Study? It’s complicated!
    http://www.mindthesciencegap.org/2012/10/08/does-music-help-you-study/
  21. Should UK higher education emulate the US? Nigel Thrift says no.
    http://chronicle.com/blogs/worldwise/why-the-u-k-higher-education-system-shouldnt-emulate-the-u-s/30612
  22. That half-hearted choice you made last week? You’ll be placing far more value on that decision in a year or three.
    http://www.psypost.org/2012/10/our-preferences-change-to-reflect-the-choices-we-make-even-three-years-later-14191
  23. Textbooks of the future: Will you be buying a product … or a service?
    http://blogs.worldbank.org/edutech/future-textbooks
  24. How the Food You Eat Makes You More (or Less) Productive
    http://lifehacker.com/5953060/how-the-food-you-eat-makes-you-more-or-less-productive
  25. The Guardian has started a blog network for higher education.
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/higher-education-network/blog/2012/oct/05/the-higher-education-blogs-network
  26. Read once and make notes. Remember this so you can read a book efficiently and effectively.
    http://www.bakadesuyo.com/2012/09/whats-the-best-way-to-learn-from-a-book/
  27. The Average Student Owns 2,000 Pounds Of Gadgets
    http://edudemic.com/2012/10/students-gadgets/
  28. Why Data Will Never Replace Thinking
    http://blogs.hbr.org/fox/2012/10/why-data-will-never-replace-thinking.html
  29. There are all sorts of reasons why you should write a blog.
    http://www.aliventures.com/not-a-problogger/
  30. The Thesis Whisperer has a piece on having a paperless desk space. I’d set up a similar space just before reading this. Dare you ditch the paper?
    http://thesiswhisperer.com/2012/10/31/going-paperless-part-one-your-desk/