Comments on: Science vs. Art http://theuniversityblog.co.uk/2008/03/14/science-vs-art/ Life doesn't stop when you study. Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:31:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: 10 Most Popular Posts of All Time on TheUniversityBlog « TheUniversityBlog http://theuniversityblog.co.uk/2008/03/14/science-vs-art/#comment-1677 Tue, 05 Jan 2010 11:03:48 +0000 http://universityblog.wordpress.com/?p=315#comment-1677 [...] 9. Science vs. Art [...]

]]> By: Martin http://theuniversityblog.co.uk/2008/03/14/science-vs-art/#comment-1482 Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:17:10 +0000 http://universityblog.wordpress.com/?p=315#comment-1482 I’ve said all I need to say on that in the comments already. Still, thanks for dropping by and leaving your thoughts, Matthew.

]]> By: Matthew http://theuniversityblog.co.uk/2008/03/14/science-vs-art/#comment-1480 Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:31:44 +0000 http://universityblog.wordpress.com/?p=315#comment-1480 Only an art student would view art and science as equals.
Art programs are for kids that couldn’t make it into any other faculty.

]]> By: Martin http://theuniversityblog.co.uk/2008/03/14/science-vs-art/#comment-1278 Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:32:59 +0000 http://universityblog.wordpress.com/?p=315#comment-1278 @Grant, that’s fair enough. As a light hearted post, it wasn’t meant to cover all the arguments or be particularly conclusive…just open up a bit of a conversation. I’d love for you to add your perspective to the comments. What’s your take?

]]> By: grant czerepak http://theuniversityblog.co.uk/2008/03/14/science-vs-art/#comment-1277 Tue, 11 Aug 2009 02:24:45 +0000 http://universityblog.wordpress.com/?p=315#comment-1277 I think your dualistic perspective is a too simplistic perspective.

]]> By: Getting an informed, balanced political debate about science | Ken's Tech Tips http://theuniversityblog.co.uk/2008/03/14/science-vs-art/#comment-1271 Sat, 08 Aug 2009 10:06:47 +0000 http://universityblog.wordpress.com/?p=315#comment-1271 [...] The University Blog: Science vs. Art Blog. 14 March 2008. Available from: http://theuniversityblog.co.uk/2008/03/14/science-vs-art/. (Retrieved 1 March [...]

]]> By: Matteo http://theuniversityblog.co.uk/2008/03/14/science-vs-art/#comment-1253 Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:20:18 +0000 http://universityblog.wordpress.com/?p=315#comment-1253 Does it really matter which discipline is better. Neither are guaranted to put money in your pocket so I don’t see why their is competition. People should study what it is they want to study and not something which is persieved to be a difficult subject.

]]> By: Getting an informed, balanced political debate about science « Ken’s Blog http://theuniversityblog.co.uk/2008/03/14/science-vs-art/#comment-1049 Mon, 04 May 2009 00:34:27 +0000 http://universityblog.wordpress.com/?p=315#comment-1049 [...] The University Blog: Science vs. Art Blog. 14 March 2008. Available from: http://theuniversityblog.co.uk/2008/03/14/science-vs-art/. (Retrieved 1 March [...]

]]> By: Martin http://theuniversityblog.co.uk/2008/03/14/science-vs-art/#comment-966 Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:40:53 +0000 http://universityblog.wordpress.com/?p=315#comment-966 And here’s another one…

http://www.mindhacks.com/blog/2009/02/think_of_the_childre.html
http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-evidence-aric-sigman-ignored/

Hopefully I’m not moving entirely off the point. I never know whether to be amused or annoyed about these stories.

]]> By: Martin http://theuniversityblog.co.uk/2008/03/14/science-vs-art/#comment-963 Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:40:48 +0000 http://universityblog.wordpress.com/?p=315#comment-963 James, while I think your statement is too sweeping, I thought this would be a good place to mention an art/science debate that’s currently taking place:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2009/feb/24/homeopathy-science

More art than science? More science than art? Or, indeed, art using science and science having none of it? :-)

]]>